Home About us Current issue Ahead of Print Back issues Submission Instructions Advertise Contact Login   

Search Article 
Advanced search 
Saudi Journal of Kidney Diseases and Transplantation
Users online: 690 Home Bookmark this page Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font size Increase font size 

Year : 2007  |  Volume : 18  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 439-442
The Comparison of Clinical and Biochemical Parameters among 1200 alive and dead Renal Transplant Recipients

Shiraz Organ Transplantation Center, Namazee Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

Correspondence Address:
Heshmatollah Salahi
Namazee Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

PMID: 17679761

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

With increasing long-term graft survival and life-long immunosuppression, cardiovascular disease and infectious complications are major causes of morbidity and mortality. We retrospectively evaluated 1200 consecutive kidney transplant patients at Shiraz Organ Transplant Center from December 1988 to December 2003. Data on demographic profile, donor source, blood pressure, rejection episodes, cause of death, and hematological and biochemical serum profiles were collected to compare alive and dead recipients. One hundred fifty six patients (13%) died in the post transplant period. Patient death was more prominent during the first years after transplantation. Most common causes of death were cardiovascular (28.3%), graft loss (20.7%), and infection (19.6%). Post transplant systolic and diastolic blood pressures, BUN, creatinine, fasting blood sugar, and total cholesterol were higher, and serum HDL lower in the dead recipients than those who remained alive (P<0.05). No significant difference was found in LDL, hemoglobin, and triglyceride values between the two groups. The one- and three-year patient survival rates were 94% and 91.5%, respectively. We conclude that the patients who died after transplantation had more risk factors than stable patients who remain alive. A multidisciplinary approach to control the co-morbid factors could be beneficial to decrease the mortality of patients after renal transplantation.

Print this article  Email this article

  Similar in PUBMED
    Search Pubmed for
    Search in Google Scholar for
  Related articles
   Citation Manager
  Access Statistics
   Reader Comments
   Email Alert *
   Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded304    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal