Home About us Current issue Ahead of Print Back issues Submission Instructions Advertise Contact Login   

Search Article 
Advanced search 
Saudi Journal of Kidney Diseases and Transplantation
Users online: 1462 Home Bookmark this page Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font size Increase font size 

LETTER TO THE EDITOR Table of Contents   
Year : 2010  |  Volume : 21  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 949-950
Protein-to-creatinine ratio: A valid estimate and alternative to 24 hour proteinuria

Department of Nephrology, Kanoo Kidney Centre, Dammam Medical Complex, P.O. Box 11825, Dammam 31463, Saudi Arabia

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication31-Aug-2010

How to cite this article:
Karkar A, Abdelrahman M. Protein-to-creatinine ratio: A valid estimate and alternative to 24 hour proteinuria. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 2010;21:949-50

How to cite this URL:
Karkar A, Abdelrahman M. Protein-to-creatinine ratio: A valid estimate and alternative to 24 hour proteinuria. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl [serial online] 2010 [cited 2023 Jan 31];21:949-50. Available from: https://www.sjkdt.org/text.asp?2010/21/5/949/68900
To the Editor,

The 24 hour urine collection test has been the gold standard method of assessing urinary pro­tein excretion in patients with nephrotic syn­drome and chronic kidney disease. It is used extensively for diagnostic and prognostic pur­poses and to assess the effects of therapy. This test is usually performed in a hospital labora­tory and requires clear instructions to patients or their companions and supplementation of pa­tients with a graduated plastic container. How­ever, there are limitations to the performance of this test. These include (1) the amount of pro­tein excretion is a function of urine volume; (2) adequate collection must be ensured; (3) it is cumbersome for patients and not many of them clearly understand or stick to the given instruc­tions; (4) it is time consuming and not always accurate; (5) lack of its availability in health centers and occasionally in hospital laboratories and (6) may constitute a huge burden on labo­ratories workload. In 1983 Ginsberg et al [1] esta­blished a quick test of single voided urine sam­ple to estimate quantitative proteinuria. In a study of 46 specimens they found an excellent correlation between the protein content of 24­hour urine collection and the protein/creatinine ratio in a single urine sample. The best corre­lation was found when samples were collected after the first voided morning specimen and be­fore bedtime. They concluded that in the pre­sence of stable renal function, a protein/crea­tinine ratio of more than 3.5 (mg/mg) can be taken to represent "nephrotic-range" proteinu­ria, and a ratio of less than 0.2 is within normal limits. This protein/creatinine ratio test on ran­dom urine samples has been recommended by the National Kidney Foundation-K/DOQI guide­ lines. [2]

In our daily practice, we faced the above men­tioned difficulties in assessing proteinuria by 24-hour urine collection. These reasons and the need to repeat measurements for a successful clinical management prompted us to evaluate the reliability of the urine protein/creatinine ratio as a replacement of the 24-hour urine collection for measurement of proteinuria. We investigated 150 patients with proteinuria due to variable causes of chronic kidney disease including diabetic nephropathy, glomeruloneph­ritis and nephrotic syndrome who were on re­gular follow up in outpatient nephrology clinic. Only 116 patients (77%) were able to fulfill the instructions of urine collection. The mean age of these patients was 52 ± 13 years and there were 60 males and 56 females. Patients were requested to provide 24-hour urine collection and a random morning urine sample for protei­nuria and protein/creatinine ratio measurements. The mean daily protein excretion was 2.168 ± 3.089 gm/24 hour and the mean protein/crea­tinine ratio was 2.171 ± 2.719 mg/mg. There was a strong and significant positive correlation between the 24-hour urine total protein excre­tion and the spot urine protein/creatinine ratio (r= 0.942, P< 0.0001, MedCalc statistical soft­ware version 10.4) as shown in the [Figure 1]. However, there might be a lower agreement between the 24-hour proteinuria and the pro­tein/creatinine ratio for higher levels of pro­teinuria. In conclusion, these results confirm the early findings of Ginsberg et al 1 and are con­sistent with similar recently published studies, [3],[4],[5] where random spot urine analysis for pro­tein/creatinine ratio could be a reliable and con­venient method that may replace the proteinuria assessment by 24-hour urine collection.
Figure 1 :Scattered diagram of spot urine protein-to-creatinine ratio and 24-hour urine protein

Click here to view

   References Top

1.Ginsberg JM, Chang BS, Matarese RA, Garella S. Use of single voided urine samples to estimate quantitative proteinuria. N Engl J Med 1983; 309:1543-6.  Back to cited text no. 1  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
2.Keane WF, Eknoyan G. Proteinuria, albuminuria, risk, assessment, detection, elimination (PARADE): A position paper of the National Kidney Foundation. Am J Kidney Dis 1999;33:1004-10.  Back to cited text no. 2  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
3.Wahbeh AM, Ewais MH, Elsharif ME. Com­parison of 24-hour urinary protein and protein­to-creatinine ratio in the assessment of protei­nuria. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 2009;20(3): 443-7.  Back to cited text no. 3      
4.Antunes VV, Veronese FJ, Morales JV. Diag­nostic accuracy of the protein/creatinine ratio in urine samples to estimate 24-H proteinuria in patients with primary glomerulopathies: a longi­tudinal study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008;23: 2242-6.  Back to cited text no. 4  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
5.Rodriguez-Thompson D, Lieberman ES. Use of a random urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio for the diagnosis of significant proteinuria during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;185:808­11.  Back to cited text no. 5  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  

Correspondence Address:
Ayman Karkar
Department of Nephrology, Kanoo Kidney Centre, Dammam Medical Complex, P.O. Box 11825, Dammam 31463
Saudi Arabia
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

PMID: 20814140

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions


  [Figure 1]


    Similar in PUBMED
    Search Pubmed for
    Search in Google Scholar for
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded1683    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal